Thursday, June 30, 2016

GORDON DUFF -- Istanbul Airport Attack: Turkey Pays for the Double Game

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades. 

Gordon Duff is an accredited diplomat and...Show More

      Istanbul Airport Attack: Turkey Pays for the Double Game

ScreenHunter_190 Jun. 30 14.00
By Sajjad Shaukat
At least 42 persons were killed and more than 230 wounded by the three suicide bombers who carried out simultaneous attacks at the Atatürk International Airport in Istanbul, on June 28, this year. Three militants opened fire to create panic outside the airport, before two of them got inside and blew themselves up.
Although no group claimed responsibility for these terror attacks, yet Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim said. “Our thoughts on those responsible for the attack lean toward Islamic State” (Also known as ISIS or ISIL or Daesh). John Brennan, head of the US CIA also stated that the attack bore the hallmarks of Islamic State “depravity.”
Ankara is part of a US-led military coalition against the ISIS in Syria and Iraq. But, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who always follow ambivalent policies has taken steps this week to improve relations with Israel and Russia to strengthen its hand in fighting against militants, said the attack at the airport should serve as a turning point in the global battle against terrorism.
While ignoring any indication regarding the militant outfit Kurdistan Workers’ Party-PKK which also did not claim responsibility for these triple suicide assaults, and which is being assisted by American CIA, including Israeli Mossad, some Jewish-controlled media suggested, “The working theory is that the attackers may have been Chechen jihadists from southwest Russia, who could have links to ISIS.” Speaking in the tone of Jewish media, a Turkish official told the AP that the “three bombers who carried out the attack on Istanbul’s main airport had connections to Russia, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan.”
The Turkish government is simultaneously facing two main terrorist organizations PKK and ISIS. Since July 2015, Turkish Special Forces have been launching a counter-terrorism campaign against the PKK. While as part of the anti-ISIS coalition, Ankara carried out numerous airstrikes against ISIS strongholds in Iraq and artillery shelling across the border with Syria.

Preston James, Ph.D -- Erdogan Smack-down

By Preston James, Ph.D on June 29, 2016
An indicator of things to come?
by  Preston James
Lately, from deep inside the Turkish high military command, there have been major concerns that Erdogan’s leadership has shifted into tyrant mode, and his aggressive part in ISIS on behalf of the Saudis, the Israelis, the CIA and the Pentagon is destroying Turkey and its economy.
A strong message was delivered to Erdogan that he had to “make amends” with the Russians and start correcting his mistakes.
Erdogan sent a letter of apology to Putin on June 27, 2016 expressing regrets for the shoot-down of a Russian aircraft.
A good guess is that Erdogan just barely sidestepped a major coup d’état and a complete loss of power.
But was his “smackdown” actually just a preview of the coming changes that are likely to occur in Europe and America too?
It’s also a very good bet that Erdogan was mind-kontrolled by sophisticated psychotronic and other means to suffer from the delusion that he was to become the new sultan and rebuild the Ottoman Empire.
The Israelis and the CIA had conned Erdogan into believing he could expand Turkey and gain a whole new empire. This promise was a lie from the very beginning and was designed to use Erdogan to generate the chaos, division and civil war needed by the Israelis and the CIA in the Mideast on behalf of the Khazarian Mafia Banksters for their Globalist NWO “Greater Israel” plan.
This delusion of empire that was driving Erdogan as a Khazarian Mafia (KM) tool had led to a checkmate with the Russian Federation and a game of chess that Turkey had zero chance of winning in the long run.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Veterans Today --Putin: Outcome of Fight Against ISIL Being Decided on Syrian Soil

Putin: Outcome of Fight Against ISIL Being Decided on Syrian Soil

By GPD on June 30, 2016

Putin: Outcome of Fight Against ISIL Being Decided on Syrian Soil
Putin: Outcome of Fight Against ISIL Being Decided on Syrian Soil
TEHRAN (FNA)- Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that the outcome of the fight against ISIL terror group is being decided on the Syrian soil.

“Syria stands at the epicenter of the battle against the ISIL  group while a resolution to the Arab republic’s civil conflict is still far off, the outcome of the fight against ISIL terror group is being decided on Syrian soil,” the Russian president said at a meeting with Russian ambassadors and permanent representatives Thursday, Ria Novosti reported.

“Syria found itself at the epicenter of the fight against terrorism. It is no exaggeration to say that the fate of this country does not only influence the future of the Middle East. The outcome of the fight against ISIL is being decided on Syrian soil,” Putin said.

“It is clear that a final settlement is still very, very far off, but the experience gained over the last few months in Syria demonstrated that only by joining efforts toward the creation of a broad anti-terrorist front urged by Russia can we successfully confront today’s threats,” he reassured.

Putin also said during his speech that the situation across the world is becoming less predictable, RT reported.

John W. Whitehead -- A Week in the Life of the American Police State

By John W. Whitehead
June 20, 2016

Those who corrupt the public mind are just as evil as those who steal from the public purse.
Adlai Stevenson, 23rd Vice President of the United States

If you’ve been caught up in the circus that is the presidential election, you’ve likely missed the latest news about all the ways in which the government continues to erode our freedoms, undermine our sovereignty, abuse our trust, invade our homes, invade our privacy, destroy our property, hijack our bank accounts, and generally render itself above the law.
Then again, this is all par for the course from a militaristic government that is armed to the teeth, wages war against its own people, imprisons its citizens for profit, marches in lockstep with the corporate elite, and treats human beings as little more than cattle to be branded, bought, sold and butchered.
The following incidents constitute a typical week in the life of the American police state.
Not content with merely spying on our emails and phone calls, the NSA wants to spy on thermostats, refrigerators, and pacemakers.
Reinforcing fears about how easily surveillance technology can be abused by government officials, local police in California are using money acquired through asset forfeiture to buy surveillance equipment that was then used to blackmail city council members.
Small-town police departments continue to militarize their forces, acquiring military equipment such as BearCat armored vehicles and SWAT teams at an alarming rate.
According to the Government Accountability Office, the majority of people in the government’s criminal face-recognition database have never committed a crime.
The private prison business is booming, signaling a profitable windfall for investors and a death knell for any American unfortunate enough to run afoul of the many laws criminalizing otherwise legitimate behavior such as growing a garden on one’s front lawn or hosting a Bible study in one’s backyard.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

The British Woke UP — Can The Americans? Paul Craig Roberts

The British Woke UP — Can The Americans?
Paul Craig Roberts

Many thanks for the support that you give to the website and for the words of encouragement and appreciation that you send to me. The website resulted from you calling me out of retirement. It is widely read and translated into foreign languages.
I try to read every email, but it is not possible for me to read and comment on the many articles and books that you send or to respond to your questions over a wide range of issues, not all of which I know anything about.
This website is a great deal of work. In our time to be truthful is to be provocative. To write provocatively leaves little room for error or mistatement as today’s euphemism terms it. I could shill for the establishment and be wrong 98% of the time and nothing ever would be said about it. But there is no forgiveness for a provocative truth-teller.
You have open inquiring minds and you want to know. Your motives are not to protect your illusions and delusions or to reinforce your emotional needs. This is why I write for you.
If no one knows or respects truth, the world is lost. But it only takes a few to change the world. The cultural anthopologist Margaret Mead said: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
Change can be for better or worse. President Reagan and a committed few overcame the resistance of the CIA and military-security complex and reduced tensions among nuclear powers by negotiating the end of the Cold War with Soviet leader Gorbachev. During the reign of the last three US presidents, a few neoconservatives resurrected the nuclear tensions and took them to a higher level than at the peak of the Cold War.
There are hopeful signs that the neoconservative drive to World War III can be derailed. It seems that finally the Russians have caught on that America is not the Holy Grail but a government reminiscent in its aggression of Nazi Germany. Hopefully, Russian countermeasures will make even the crazed neocons think twice.
The British people, or rather a majority of those who voted, surprised the Establishment, which was confident of the success of its propaganda, by voting to save their ancient and distinguished country, the font of liberty, from disappearing into the EU, a dictatorship ruled by unaccountable appointees. The British had enough of that with kings and decided that the future did not lie in going backward. The British vote to exit the EU could bring the unintended consequence of unravelling the EU and NATO, thus reducing Washington’s ability to foment war.
Americans need to decide that they, like the British, do not appreciate being led backward to worse times.
The Clintons and the Republican Senator from Texas, Phil Gramm, led America back to Robber Baron days by deregulating the financial system.,28804,1877351_1877350_1877330,00.html
The senator was rewarded with a multi-million dollar banking job for overturning Great Depression era legislation that made financial capitalism workable. Americans need to understand that capitalists do not care if capitalism works for you as long as it works for them.
The collapse of the Soviet Union, due to the arrest of Gorbachev by hardline elements in the Communist Party, gave rise to the American Neoconservatives, a double handful of people closely tied to the Israeli government. These few people have involved America, for Israel’s benefit, in 15 years of warfare that has destroyed seven counries, with the cost to Americans of approximately $7 trillion dollars, according to Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes.
The obviously false excuse for this destruction of peoples and resources is the myth of “terrorism.” Most “terrorist events” in the US have been sting operations organized by the FBI in order to collect the multi-billion dollar bounty that Congress gives for preventing terrorist events. How best to keep this bounty flowing than to organize a terrorist event and prevent it? It is debatable whether such events as 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombing, Sandy Hook, San Bernandino, and Orlando are false flag events or drills staged by crisis actors and presented to the public as real.
The debt associated with 15 years of Washington’s wars is now being used to attack Social Security and Medicare. The One Percent and their “free market” apologists are determined that the elderly will pay for the wars that enabled Israel to reduce Palestine to a ghetto and for the wars that enriched the profits and power of the military-secutity complex, while inflicting a massive refugee problem on Europe.
If the British, or enough of them, woke up, perhaps something similar can happen in America.
From many of you I hear your frustrations with family, friends, and associates who are content with what they hear from the BBC, Fox “News,” CNN, and the New York Times. Obviously, if everyone was intelligent and could think for themselves or even had time to consider what they are told, we would not be in the state that we are in.
Our job is to get enough people into the habit of thinking for themselves that we have the few required to change the world. (“Few” is relative. In a country of 300 million people, “few” is probably several million.)
Arguing with friends doesn’t work. Arguments generate hostility and competitiveness. Avoid arguing. Your friends and family do not know anything. They sit in front of Fox “News” and CNN. They are brainwashed.
Perhaps one way to approach friends and family is to ask questions. For example, how can there be 103 casualties in Orlando and no visible evidence of the massive number of ambulances and EMT personnel necessary to deal with such a massive number of casualties? I asked my readers to help me prove the official story line, and no one could come up with convincing visible evidence. How can there be such a massive event without abundant evidence?
How can powerfully constructed skyscrapers, built to withstand airplane collisions, suddenly explode allegedly as a result of minor asymmetrical damage and scattered low temperature office fires? How can the entire contents of the towers be pulverized when there is insufficient gravational energy to accomplish such pulverization?
How is it possible that WTC 7 came down in free fall acceleration in the absence of controlled demolition? Why doubt that there was controlled demolition when the owner of the WTC said on TV (still available online) that “the decision was made to pull the building?”
In case you have forgotten, you “pull” a building with controlled demolition. It takes a long time to wire a building for demolition. Obviously, Building 7 was not wired on September 11, 2001.
We are constantly informed by the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, numerous senators and representatives, by NATO commanders, by EU politicians, by presstitutes, and others, that “Russia has invaded Ukraine.”
Take a minute and think about this extraordinary lie. Clearly, evidence is no longer a factor in determining what is occuring. Assertion only rules. Take a second to look outside The Matrix. Is it really possible that Ukraine would still exist if Russia invaded? I would bet my life that within 60 hours of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, Ukraine would again be part of Russia.
Remember August 2008 when the US and Israeli trained and equipped Georgian army invaded the peacekeeping realm of South Ossetia, killing Russian peace-keeping troops and Ossetian civilians. Putin was at the Beijing Olympics, but Russian armed forces quickly smashed the American/Israeli trained and equipped Georgian army. Putin held Geogia in his palm.
What did Putin do after delivering this lesson in the superiority of Russian arms? He released Georgia and returned home.
So how is it that Putin, according to the entirely of the Western political establishment and media whores, is determined to rebuild the Soviet Empire? Putin held Georgia. No power on earth could have forced him to release Georgia. But Putin withdrew Russia’s forces and released the country. The former Georgian president is now an American operative in Ukraine.
If you consider the number of outsiders, including US citizens and the former president of Georgia, who serve in the Ukrainian government, it raises questions about the so-called “Maidan Revolution” in February 2014. If this really was a popular uprising, and not a Washington orchestrated coup, why is there such a shortage of Ukrainians to form the new government that foreign citizens have to be brought in to rule the country?
Do not believe any official explanation of anything. Things are not true just because the government and presstitutes say so. Keep in mind that official explanations can be cover for hidden agendas. If Washington and the media have their way, we will live in a world constructed out of lies designed to hide from us the real interests being served.

That is not the kind of world that any of us want to live in. 

English -- Benjamin Fulford: 27:06:2016 -- FULL REPORT

The EU is bankrupt and that is why its governing structure will fundamentally change

June 27, 2016
Author: BenjaminFulford

The real reason for the ongoing trouble in the European Union, including the recent vote by the British people to leave the bloc, is that the EU is bankrupt. We know in retrospect that the bankruptcy of the Soviet Union was the real reason the Warsaw pact fell apart, with Poland acting as the first domino. For the same reason, we can predict England was the first domino in the collapse of the European Union.

The emerging consensus view is, as Pentagon analysts put it, “Brexit may lead to Frexit (French exit), the collapse of banks, populism, nationalism and anti-globalism.” This is also likely lead to an end to Khazarian mafia sponsored Mulsim immigration.

The situation in France has already become so chaotic that French police say they are becoming too exhausted to deal with the daily, violent demonstrations taking place throughout the country. French President Francois Hollande, who has only 11% public support, is trying to ban demonstrations but it is hard to see who will enforce his “ban.” In other words, France is headed for revolution.

“This is the worst period I recall, there is nothing like it,” is how former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan described the general situation and the market chaos that followed the Brexit vote.

Monday, June 27, 2016

THIERRY MEYSSAN -- Le Brexit redistribue la géopolitique mondiale

Le Brexit redistribue la géopolitique mondiale
par Thierry Meyssan
Alors que la presse internationale cherche des moyens pour relancer la construction européenne, toujours sans la Russie et désormais sans le Royaume-Uni, Thierry Meyssan considère que rien ne pourra plus éviter l’effondrement du système. Cependant, souligne-t-il, ce qui est en jeu, ce n’est pas l’Union européenne elle-même, mais l’ensemble des institutions qui permettent la domination des États-Unis dans le monde et l’intégrité des États-Unis eux-mêmes.

JPEG - 47.5 ko
Favorable au Brexit, la reine Elizabeth va pouvoir réorienter son pays vers le yuan.
Personne ne semble comprendre les conséquences de la décision britannique de quitter l’Union européenne. Les commentateurs, qui interprètent la politique politicienne et ont perdu depuis longtemps la connaissance des enjeux internationaux, se sont focalisés sur les éléments d’une campagne absurde : d’un côté les adversaires d’une immigration sans contrôle et de l’autre des « pères fouettards » menaçant le Royaume-Uni des pires tourments.
Or, les enjeux de cette décision n’ont aucun rapport avec ces thèmes. Le décalage entre la réalité et le discours politico-médiatique illustre la maladie dont souffrent les élites occidentales : leur incompétence.
Alors que le voile se déchire sous nos yeux, nos élites ne comprennent pas plus la situation que le Parti communiste de l’Union soviétique n’envisageait les conséquences de la chute du Mur de Berlin en novembre 1989 : la dissolution l’URSS en décembre 1991, puis du Conseil d’assistance économique mutuelle (Comecon) et du Pacte de Varsovie six mois plus tard, puis encore les tentatives de démantèlement de la Russie elle-même qui faillit perdre la Tchétchènie.
Dans un futur très proche, nous assisterons identiquement à la dissolution de l’Union européenne, puis de l’Otan, et s’ils n’y prennent garde au démantèlement des États-Unis.
Quels intérêts derrière le Brexit ?
Contrairement aux rodomontades de Nigel Farage, l’UKIP n’est pas à l’origine du référendum qu’il vient de gagner. Cette décision a été imposée à David Cameron par des membres du Parti conservateur.
Pour eux, la politique de Londres doit être une adaptation pragmatique aux évolutions du monde. Cette « nation d’épiciers », ainsi que la qualifiait Napoléon, observe que les États-Unis ne sont plus ni la première économie mondiale, ni la première puissance militaire. Ils n’ont donc plus de raison d’en être les partenaires privilégiés.
De même que Margaret Thatcher n’avait pas hésité à détruire l’industrie britannique pour transformer son pays en un centre financier mondial ; de même ces conservateurs n’ont pas hésité à ouvrir la voie à l’indépendance de l’Écosse et de l’Irlande du Nord, et donc à la perte du pétrole de la mer du Nord, pour faire de la City le premier centre financier off shore du yuan.
La campagne pour le Brexit a été largement soutenue par la Gentryet le palais de Buckingham qui ont mobilisé la presse populaire pour appeler à revenir à l’indépendance.
Contrairement à ce qu’explique la presse européenne, le départ des Britanniques de l’UE ne se fera pas lentement parce que l’UE va s’effondrer plus vite que le temps nécessaire aux négociations bureaucratiques de leur sortie. Les États du Comecon n’ont pas eu à négocier leur sortie parce que le Comecon a cessé de fonctionner dès le mouvement centrifuge amorcé. Les États membres de l’UE qui s’accrochent aux branches et persistent à sauver ce qui reste de l’Union vont rater leur adaptation à la nouvelle donne au risque de connaître les douloureuses convulsions des premières années de la nouvelle Russie : chute vertigineuse du niveau de vie et de l’espérance de vie.
Pour la centaine de milliers de fonctionnaires, d’élus et de collaborateurs européens qui perdront inévitablement leur emploi et pour les élites nationales qui sont également tributaires de ce système, il convient d’urgence de réformer les institutions pour les sauver. Tous considèrent à tort que le Brexit ouvre une brèche dans laquelle les Eurosceptiques vont s’engouffrer. Or, le Brexit n’est qu’une réponse au déclin des États-Unis.
Le Pentagone, qui prépare le sommet de l’Otan à Varsovie, n’a pas non plus compris qu’il n’était plus en position d’imposer à ses alliés de développer leur budget de Défense et de soutenir ses aventures militaires. La domination de Washington sur le reste du monde est terminée.
Nous changeons d’ère.
Qu’est-ce-qui va changer ?
La chute du bloc soviétique a d’abord été la mort d’une vision du monde. Les Soviétiques et leurs alliés voulaient construire une société solidaire où l’on mette le plus de choses possible en commun. Ils ont eu une bureaucratie titanesque et des dirigeants nécrosés.
Le Mur de Berlin n’a pas été abattu par des anti-communistes, mais par une coalition des Jeunesses communistes et des Églises luthériennes. Ils entendaient refonder l’idéal communiste débarrassé de la tutelle soviétique, de la police politique et de la bureaucratie. Ils ont été trahis par leurs élites qui, après avoir servi les intérêts des Soviétiques se sont engouffrés avec autant d’ardeur pour servir ceux des États-uniens. Les électeurs du Brexit les plus engagés cherchent d’abord à retrouver leur souveraineté nationale et à faire payer aux dirigeants ouest-européens l’arrogance dont ils ont fait preuve en imposant le Traité de Lisbonne après le rejet populaire de la Constitution européenne (2004-07). Ils pourraient eux aussi être déçus par ce qui va suivre.
Le Brexit marque la fin de la domination idéologique des États-Unis, celle de la démocratie au rabais des « Quatre libertés ». Dans son discours sur l’état de l’union de 1941, le président Roosevelt les avaient définies comme (1) la liberté de parole et d’expression, (2) la liberté de chacun d’honorer Dieu comme il l’entend, (3) la liberté du besoin, (4) la liberté de la peur [d’une agression étrangère]. Si les Anglais vont revenir à leurs traditions, les Européens continentaux vont retrouver les questionnements des révolutions française et russe sur la légitimité du pouvoir, et bouleverser leurs institutions au risque de voir resurgir le conflit franco-allemand.
Le Brexit marque aussi la fin de la domination militaro-économique US ; l’Otan et l’UE n’étant que les deux faces d’une seule et unique pièce, même si la construction de la Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune a été plus longue à mettre en œuvre que celle du libre-échange. Récemment, je rédigeais une note sur cette politique face à la Syrie. J’examinais tous les documents internes de l’UE, qu’ils soient publics ou non publiés, pour arriver à la conclusion qu’ils ont été rédigés sans aucune connaissance de la réalité de terrain, mais à partir des notes du ministère allemand des Affaires étrangères, lui-même reproduisant les instructions du département d’État US. J’avais eu il y a quelques années à effectuer la même démarche pour un autre État et j’étais arrivé à une conclusion similaire (sauf que dans cet autre cas, l’intermédiaire n’était pas le gouvernement allemand, mais le français).
Premières conséquences au sein de l’UE
Actuellement, des syndicats français rejettent le projet de loi sur le Travail qui a été rédigé par le gouvernement Valls sur la base d’un rapport de l’Union européenne, lui-même inspiré par les instructions du département d’État US. Si la mobilisation de la CGT a permis aux Français de découvrir le rôle de l’UE dans cette affaire, ils n’ont toujours pas saisi l’articulation UE-USA. Ils ont compris qu’en inversant les normes et en plaçant les accords d’entreprise au-dessus des accords de branche, le gouvernement remettait en réalité en cause la prééminence de la Loi sur le contrat, mais ils ignorent la stratégie de Joseph Korbel et de ses deux enfants, sa fille naturelle la démocrate Madeleine Albright et sa fille adoptive la républicaine Condoleezza Rice. Le professeur Korbel assurait que pour dominer le monde, il suffisait que Washington impose une réécriture des relations internationales dans des termes juridiques anglo-saxons. En effet, en plaçant le contrat au-dessus de la Loi le droit anglo-saxon privilégie sur le long terme les riches et les puissants par rapport aux pauvres et aux misérables.
Il est probable que les Français, les Hollandais, les Danois et d’autres encore tenteront de se détacher de l’UE. Ils devront pour cela affronter leur classe dirigeante. Si la durée de ce combat est imprévisible, son issue ne fait plus de doute. Quoi qu’il en soit, dans la période de bouleversement qui s’annonce, les ouvriers français seront difficilement manipulables, à la différence de leurs homologues anglais, aujourd’hui désorganisés.
Premières conséquences pour le Royaume-Uni
Le Premier ministre David Cameron a argué des vacances d’été pour remettre sa démission à octobre. Son successeur, en principe Boris Johnson, peut donc préparer le changement pour l’appliquer instantanément à son arrivée à Downing Street. Le Royaume-Uni n’attendra pas sa sortie définitive de l’UE pour mener sa propre politique. À commencer par se dissocier des sanctions prises à l’encontre de la Russie et de la Syrie.
Contrairement à ce qu’écrit la presse européenne, la City de Londres n’est pas directement concernée par le Brexit. Compte tenu de son statut particulier d’État indépendant placé sous l’autorité de la Couronne, elle n’a jamais fait partie de l’Union européenne. Certes, elle ne pourra plus abriter les sièges sociaux de certaines compagnies qui se replieront dans l’Union, mais au contraire elle pourra utiliser la souveraineté de Londres pour développer le marché du yuan. Déjà en avril, elle a obtenu les privilèges nécessaires en signant un accord avec la Banque centrale de Chine. En outre, elle devrait développer ses activités de paradis fiscal pour les Européens.
Si le Brexit va temporairement désorganiser l’économie britannique en attente de nouvelles règles, il est probable que le Royaume-Uni —ou tout au moins l’Angleterre— se réorganisera rapidement pour son plus grand profit. Reste à savoir si les concepteurs de ce tremblement de terre auront la sagesse d’en faire profiter leur peuple : le Brexit est un retour à la souveraineté nationale, il ne garantit pas la souveraineté populaire.
Le paysage international peut évoluer de manière très différente selon les réactions qui vont suivre. Même si cela devait tourner mal pour certains peuples, il vaut toujours mieux coller à la réalité comme le font les Britanniques plutôt que de persister dans un rêve jusqu’à ce qu’il se fracasse.

United Russia party congress

United Russia party congress

Vladimir Putin is taking part in political party United Russia’s 15thcongress.
June 27, 2016
Avbailable also HERE

At the 15th Congress of the United Russia party.

At the 15th Congress of the United Russia party.

The congress will approve the party’s election campaign programme and present party lists of candidates for the upcoming State Duma election.
* * *
President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Colleagues, friends,
I welcome the delegates and guests at this United Russia congress.

This congress is an important stage in the election campaign. Today, you will decide on the campaign programme and the list of candidates for the State Duma election. This really is a fundamental moment because it lets the voters see who you propose for this election and what they offer.

The voters want to see victory go to respected and professional candidates who understand people’s needs and want to take part in selfless and productive work for the good of the country and its people.


At midday on Friday 5 February, 2016 Julian Assange, John Jones QC, Melinda Taylor, Jennifer Robinson and Baltasar Garzon will be speaking at a press conference at the Frontline Club on the decision made by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on the Assange case.


the way we live






AT 08:00h UTC

By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread the word, we can and will build a brighter future.


Report 26:01:2015














AT 08:00 H GMT



AT 08:00 H GMT

PressTV News Videos